—For his anti-Semitism?

An anti-Semite in the White House

The headline Friday morning, White House outrage—“Netanyahu spit in our face and there will be a price to pay,” is not new outrage by Obama towards Netanyahu and Israel. Notice the term “outrage” was used throughout media reports. Rage is not anger caused by an event. Rage is the explosion of a simmering hate. This is not new for Obama towards Netanyahu and Israel. Rage towards Israel can only be explained by one thing—anti-Semitism.

This is a sad day. President Obama is an anti-Semite. Last October the President supported the anti-Semite Mahmoud Abbas and the anti-Semitic Palistinian Authority in their stated purpose to have a “Jew free State.” But well before David Horowitz at Frontpage Mag described President Obama as an anti-Semite and Reverend John Hagee, President of Christians United For Israel, has confirmed the same analysis. (CUFI is my vehicle for support to Israel.) Yesterday radio talk host and author Mark Levin weighed in:

I’m going to tell you something and it’s going to be unconformable. I don’t care how many wealthy Jews Obama surrounds himself with, I don’t care how many wealthy Jews contribute to his campaign. This man has all the signals of an anti-Semite and I’m not going to take that word back. I believe this in my heart and my soul. It’s not about Israel, it’s about what’s in Israel.

Let’s review recent history. Tuesday, January 20, was Obama’s big night. He was in charge of a quiet world. He had won the war against “terrorism.” Republicans were to sit down and shut up. We were on a path to a “deal” with Iran. For all he said, Israel may not even exist.

But then it was Wednesday morning!

U.S. House of Representatives Speaker, John Boehner announced to the House Republican Conference he has invited Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to address a joint session of Congress on February 11 (since rescheduled for March 3).

“[T]oday I will announce that I am inviting the Prime Minister of Israel, a great friend of this country, to address a joint meeting of Congress next month. And I am specifically asking him to address Congress on the threats posed by radical Islam and Iran. America and Israel have always stood together in shared cause and common ideals, and now we must rise to the moment again. Let’s send a clear message to the White House – and the world – about our commitment to Israel and our allies.” Boehner told his fellow Republicans.

Coincidentally (?) my friend and American treasure Pamela Geller reprinted this incredibly insightful piece Wednesday:

This piece by J. Christian Adams is brief but revelatory: he exposes Obama’s assumptions that only American weakness, rather than American strength, can bring peace to the world, and his deeply ingrained antisemitism. I exposed both of these in my book The Post-American Presidency: The Obama Administration’s War with America. It is good to see that others are awakening to this as well.

“Iran, Obama and the Jewish Donor Lie,” by J. Christian Adams, PJ Tatler, January 22, 2015:

Cliff May has this important revelation in today’s Washington Times:

At a closed-door meeting of Senate Democrats in Baltimore last Thursday, Mr. Obama not only repeated his warning that even deadline-triggered sanctions would lead to war, he charged that those congressmen favoring such a bill were doing so only to please “donors.”

 Sources told The New York Times that Mr. Menendez “stood up and said he took ‘personal offense.’” He added that he has been working on this issue for years, has always “focused on the long-term implications,” and that it will be impossible to cobble together a new sanctions bill quickly next summer should Iran continue to stonewall.

Let’s decode this revelation from behind closed doors.  First, it is newsworthy enough that Obama believes any sanctions package would “lead to war.”  This is more than posturing.  This is a reflection of Obama’s extremist pedigree on national security issues.  In college, Obama wrote campus newspaper attacks on the deployment of Pershing missiles in West Germany, because, you guessed it, it would lead to war.  A favorite meme of the radical national security left is that everything will lead to war.  If America detains terrorist warriors in Gitmo, it will lead to war with Islam.  If America has a robust military, it will lead to war.  If Israel doesn’t give up land for peace, it will lead to war.  And on and on it goes, the West should be surrender, compromise and stand down, else it leads to war.  Of course the history of the 20th Century is precisely the opposite.

But the second and bigger revelation is the revelation that Obama thinks support for sanctions on Iran is being driven by donor money.  To anyone who pays attention to the Islamist narrative, this means one and only one thing: Jewish money.

True, Obama doesn’t come out and explicitly use the term “Jewish money. ” But he isn’t talking about Hispanic money or Silicon Valley money when he scolds his fellow Democrats behind closed doors.  One of the many traditions the Islamists preserved from Nazi Germany (besides death worship and genocidal designs for the Jewish people) is the myth that Jewish money pulls the strings. This meme echoes through multimedia platforms throughout the Middle East.

Obama doesn’t say precisely the same thing with the same venomous zeal you find directly from these sources.  But his watered down accusation that Democrats like Bob Menendez is in favor of tough sanctions against Iran because of the influence of donor money should be condemned.  It also reveals a pedigree even more frightful than his pedigree merely supporting Western weakness.

Geller added this from The Israel Project.

Just wanted to make sure you have the facts about Iran, etc., since the President mentioned it in the speech tonight.

For over a year the admin has claimed, falsely, that Iran’s nuclear program has been “frozen” & their “progress halted” during the talks — talks we were told would only last 6 months, yet are now heading toward 19 months (June 30th).

FAR FROM being “halted”, during the negotiations, Iran has enriched at least one more bomb’s worth of material, has advanced its plutonium track to 87% completion, and just announced it will build 2 more nuclear facilities. Does that sound “frozen” to you?  Not to mention other facts that contradict WH claims.

Tonight the President has threatened, again, to veto bipartisan legislation from Menendez-Kirk by implying FALSELY that (1) it contains sanctions on Iran at this time and (2) will guarantee diplomacy will fail.

Those are ridiculous claims. First, the bill imposes no sanctions on Iran during talks what so ever. If there is a deal by 6/30 — a deadline the president set and says will tell us if Iran is willing to make a deal or not — there are no sanctions.

Second, it is totally counter-intuitive to suggest that Iran will walk away nuclear talks it desperately needs to save its broken economy because of some sanctions that will never come into being if there is an agreement — which they claim they want.

Like past dire claims — like central bank sanctions will drive the world into recession or oil prices will soar to $250 a barrel (yes they really said these things) these latest inexplicable claims are worthless and false.

Just wanted to make sure you have the facts about Iran, etc., since the President mentioned it in the speech tonight.

For over a year the admin has claimed, falsely, that Iran’s nuclear program has been “frozen” & their “progress halted” during the talks — talks we were told would only last 6 months, yet are now heading toward 19 months (June 30th).

Obama Won’t Talk To The Prime Minister Of Israel, But He’ll Talk To THESE Clowns

Anti-Semite might be among the kindest things you’ll hear said about this disastrous President soon.