DOJ: PHONY SCANDAL OR SELECTIVE AND ILLEGAL APPLICATION OF THE LAW?

Posted on July 31, 2013 by Richard Johnson

“On the day President Obama was elected, armed men wearing the black berets and jackboots of the New Black Panther Party were stationed at the entrance to a polling place in Philadelphia.” J Christian Adams

Back in 2004 Hugh Hewitt wrote the book If It’s Not Close They can’t Cheat an argument that, in the next several election cycles, civilization itself is at stake. The title infers that Democrats win close elections because they cheat.  That thesis has been born out in elections going back to 1960 (Presidential) right through the election last year.

The 2010 Senatorial election in my home state of Minnesota was an up close experience. After the votes were tallied, Republican Senator Norm Coleman led Democrat challenger Al Franken by 215 votes triggering a mandatory recount. In Minnesota recounts are generally honest in all but three counties; Hennepin (Minneapolis), Ramsey (St. Paul) and St Louis (Duluth and the Iron Range). Fraudulent shenanigans by Democrats in those counties will win them every close recount in Minnesota.

Weeks after the very close 2008 Presidential election, career attorneys in the Civil Rights Division of the Justice Department filed a civil lawsuit against the New Black Panther Party and three of its members, saying they violated the 1965 Voting Rights Act by scaring voters with weapon, uniforms and racial slurs (“You are about to be ruled by the black man, cracker!”). This case was so open and shut it was not even going to trial.

Of course January 20, 2009 everything changed towards a “fundamental transformation” of America. Within weeks the case was dismissed by Associate Attorney General Thomas Perrelli, an Obama pick, against the protestations of six career Civil Rights Division attorneys.

“Open contempt is voiced [by the DOJ] for these types of cases.”

Adams and Book

One of the six was J. Christian Adams who resigned from his career at the Department of Justice over Perrelli’s corrupt action which laid down the tone for approved Civil Rights Division decisions. Mr. Adams wrote a book, Injustice, in which he detailed this case and the corruption and illegal selective law enforcement at President Obama’s Department of Justice.

Mr. Adams wrote, “Most disturbing, the dismissal is part of a creeping lawlessness infusing our government institutions. Citizens would be shocked to learn about the open and pervasive hostility within the Justice Department to bringing civil rights cases against nonwhite defendants on behalf of white victims. Equal enforcement of justice is not a priority of this administration. Open contempt is voiced for these types of cases.” Read the entire article written by Mr. Adams June 25, 2010.

ADAMS: Inside the Black Panther case

Anger, ignorance and lies

On the day President Obama was elected, armed men wearing the black berets and jackboots of the New Black Panther Party were stationed at the entrance to a polling place in Philadelphia. They brandished a weapon and intimidated voters and poll watchers. After the election, the Justice Department brought a voter-intimidation case against the New Black Panther Party and those armed thugs. I and other Justice attorneys diligently pursued the case and obtained an entry of default after the defendants ignored the charges. Before a final judgment could be entered in May 2009, our superiors ordered us to dismiss the case.

The New Black Panther case was the simplest and most obvious violation of federal law I saw in my Justice Department career. Because of the corrupt nature of the dismissal, statements falsely characterizing the case and, most of all, indefensible orders for the career attorneys not to comply with lawful subpoenas investigating the dismissal, this month I resigned my position as a Department of Justice (DOJ) attorney.

The federal voter-intimidation statutes we used against the New Black Panthers were enacted because America never realized genuine racial equality in elections. Threats of violence characterized elections from the end of the Civil War until the passage of the Voting Rights Act in 1965. Before the Voting Rights Act, blacks seeking the right to vote, and those aiding them, were victims of violence and intimidation. But unlike the Southern legal system, Southern violence did not discriminate. Black voters were slain, as were the white champions of their cause. Some of the bodies were tossed into bogs and in one case in Philadelphia, Miss., they were buried together in an earthen dam.

Based on my firsthand experiences, I believe the dismissal of the Black Panther case was motivated by a lawless hostility toward equal enforcement of the law. Others still within the department share my assessment. The department abetted wrongdoers and abandoned law-abiding citizens victimized by the New Black Panthers. The dismissal raises serious questions about the department’s enforcement neutrality in upcoming midterm elections and the subsequent 2012 presidential election.

The U.S. Commission on Civil Rights has opened an investigation into the dismissal and the DOJ’s skewed enforcement priorities. Attorneys who brought the case are under subpoena to testify, but the department ordered us to ignore the subpoena, lawlessly placing us in an unacceptable legal limbo.

The assistant attorney general for civil rights, Tom Perez, has testified repeatedly that the “facts and law” did not support this case. That claim is false. If the actions in Philadelphia do not constitute voter intimidation, it is hard to imagine what would, short of an actual outbreak of violence at the polls. Let’s all hope this administration has not invited that outcome through the corrupt dismissal.

Most corrupt of all, the lawyers who ordered the dismissal – Loretta King, the Obama-appointed acting head of the Civil Rights Division, and Steve Rosenbaum – did not even read the internal Justice Department memorandums supporting the case and investigation. Just as Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. admitted that he did not read the Arizona immigration law before he condemned it, Mr. Rosenbaum admitted that he had not bothered to read the most important department documents detailing the investigative facts and applicable law in the New Black Panther case. Christopher Coates, the former Voting Section chief, was so outraged at this dereliction of responsibility that he actually threw the memos at Mr. Rosenbaum in the meeting where they were discussing the dismissal of the case. The department subsequently removed all of Mr. Coates’ responsibilities and sent him to South Carolina.

Mr. Perez also inaccurately testified to the House Judiciary Committee that federal “Rule 11” required the dismissal of the lawsuit. Lawyers know that Rule 11 is an ethical obligation to bring only meritorious claims, and such a charge by Mr. Perez effectively challenges the ethics and professionalism of the five attorneys who commenced the case. Yet the attorneys who brought the case were voting rights experts and would never pursue a frivolous matter. Their experience in election law far surpassed the experience of the officials who ordered the dismissal.

Some have called the actions in Philadelphia an isolated incident, not worthy of federal attention. To the contrary, the Black Panthers in October 2008 announced a nationwide deployment for the election. We had indications that polling-place thugs were deployed elsewhere, not only in November 2008, but also during the Democratic primaries, where they targeted white Hillary Rodham Clinton supporters. In any event, the law clearly prohibits even isolated incidents of voter intimidation.

Others have falsely claimed that no voters were affected. Not only did the evidence rebut this claim, but the law does not require a successful effort to intimidate; it punishes even the attempt.

Most disturbing, the dismissal is part of a creeping lawlessness infusing our government institutions. Citizens would be shocked to learn about the open and pervasive hostility within the Justice Department to bringing civil rights cases against nonwhite defendants on behalf of white victims. Equal enforcement of justice is not a priority of this administration. Open contempt is voiced for these types of cases.

Some of my co-workers argued that the law should not be used against black wrongdoers because of the long history of slavery and segregation. Less charitable individuals called it “payback time.” Incredibly, after the case was dismissed, instructions were given that no more cases against racial minorities like the Black Panther case would be brought by the Voting Section.

Refusing to enforce the law equally means some citizens are protected by the law while others are left to be victimized, depending on their race. Core American principles of equality before the law and freedom from racial discrimination are at risk. Hopefully, equal enforcement of the law is still a point of bipartisan, if not universal, agreement.

However, after my experience with the New Black Panther dismissal and the attitudes held by officials in the Civil Rights Division, I am beginning to fear the era of agreement over these core American principles has passed.

Posted in A Criminal Enterprise, Lawless Government, Obama, Obama's America: Racism, Scandal | Leave a comment

USERS SAY OBAMA-PHONES ARE PAID FOR WITH “OBAMA MONEY:” THE RICHEST MAN IN THE WORLD KNOWS BETTER

Posted on July 30, 2013 by Richard Johnson

Obama Phone

They are called Obama Phones because his fans credit President Obama with their free phones. Of course they should credit you because as a taxpayer (Lifeline tax or general revenue) you pay for them. Obama didn’t start the Program. It is in its 30th year. The label Obama phone might be appropriate. Since taking office the federal expenditure for the Lifeline program (Obama Phone) has tripled. Tripled!

This is neither a scandal nor a cover-up. If you can use Google, in a few minutes you can find out more than you’re getting here. What it is, however, is corrupt. Good old fashioned corruption. Let me name this particular corruption—Carlos Slim. Carlos Slim currently is the richest person in the world ahead of Bill Gates ad Warren Buffet. With holdings in several companies, Carlos Slim, who dominates wireless communications in Latin America, owns a controlling interest in the American telecommunications company TracFone. TracFone seems (details are murky) to have about one third of the Obama Phone market. Mr. Slim does not run the company. The TracFone President and CEO who runs the company for Mr. Slim, is Frederick “F.J.” Pollak.

In the 2012 cycle, Pollak gave at least $50 thousand to the Obama campaign. Now get this, Mrs. Pollak, Abigail, is a campaign bundler for Obama. She has raised more than $632,000 for the president this cycle. The return for TracFone and Carlos Slim is tens of millions of new annual profit. You can bet Mr. Slim has a Pollak in his communications across Latin America. You, on the other hand have a lawless President leading a corrupt government.

There is plenty of other corruption in the Obama Regime. We’ll get back to it when the scandals, cover-ups and felonies let up a bit.

Posted in Corruption | Leave a comment

FOREIGN CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS—MERELY CORRUPTION OR FELONIOUS MR. PRESIDENT?

Posted on July 29, 2013 by Richard Johnson

This “scandal” didn’t really catch hold in 2012. The fraud (major) media, ya know. And the chicken Republicans, ya know. But most of all, Benghazi, don’t you know? Those of us that should have pounced on this international lawlessness were consumed with Benghazi and, of course, that “hateful film.”

The Obama campaign owns more than 400 Web domain names but does not own Obama.com. That is owned by Obama bundler and Chicago expatriate Robert Roche who lives in Shanghai, China. This connection is the prime example of the Obama 2012 campaign method which brought in an estimated $200 million of illegal foreign contributions. Obama is an international brand. People all over the world are drawn to Obama.com and interlocking Facebook pages. When you enter Obama.com, your browser takes you to the donation page of Obama’s Organizing for Action Site (formerly other Organizing for America).

Robert Roach.1

Roche, like other Obama insiders, is in the 1% of the 1% of the hated 1%ers. He is an inside player with the rulers of China. Much of his top altitude wealth and influence flows through a marketing firm in China. Foreigners cannot own businesses in China so his business is owned by the Chinese rulers who sit on his board. When you hear Donald Trump rail against China declaring the Chinese are robbing us blind, you need to see Robert Roche in your mind’s eye. The Obama campaign has a Sunni bundler as well.

The key digging was done by Steve Bannon, Chairman of Breitbart.com and Stanford professor Peter Schweizer. Bannon and Schweizer did the work through the Government Accountability Institute which they cofounded. Bannon is the Chairman and Schweizer serves as the President. They studied Congressional and Presidential campaign contributions with experts digging out deeply buried Web connections. Their findings are published at Campaign Funding Risks.

America the Vulnerable

If you want the whole story, Power Lines Scott Johnson provides it in detail here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, and here.

For those on the go, Investor’s Business Daily laid the story out simply and clearly in this 600 word story:

A new study suggests that President Obama’s campaign systematically pursued foreign contributions to fuel his run for the presidency, a violation of law. Is America’s democracy now for sale to the highest bidder?

The Government Accountability Institute, which is headed by Stanford University Professor Peter Schweizer, used sophisticated Internet investigative tools — including something called “spidering” software — to determine how the web is being used to raise political funds.

What it found should be of concern, since it suggests that many in Congress and, more importantly, the Obama campaign have systematically exploited loopholes in the law to raise millions of dollars overseas — a big chunk of it in the People’s Republic of China.

How is this done? Through the mundane use of what’s called in the credit-card world the Card Verification Value, or CVV. It’s the three-digit number on the back of a card that helps positively identify that the person using the card has it in his or her possession. It’s a key anti-fraud weapon, used by nearly all legitimate e-commerce businesses and charities.

Obama’s campaign doesn’t use it. Mitt Romney’s does. So why the particular concern over Obama?

As the report notes, letting a flood of money into the political system with no verification of its source is an invitation to fraud — especially from overseas.

The report adds, “the Internet’s ability to disintermediate campaign contributions on a mass scale, as well as outmoded and lax Federal Election Commission rules, make U.S. elections vulnerable to foreign influence.”

Is Obama exploiting this? Under federal election law, contributions from foreign sources are prohibited. But the law also doesn’t require a campaign to disclose the source of contributions less than $200, and it doesn’t even have to keep records for those giving less than $50.

In September, for instance, Obama’s campaign announced it had raised $181 million. But if you’re looking for transparency, you won’t find it: Just 2% of that amount — $3.6 million — has to be reported to the FEC.

Of special concern are funds flowing into the Obama campaign from foreign sources, especially China.

In 2008, Robert Roche, a U.S. businessman based in Shanghai with extensive commercial ties to the Chinese government, bought the website Obama.com.

Roche, a big-time bundler for Obama, was given a place of honor at the head table with Obama and first lady Michelle Obama at a 2011 state dinner for Chinese President Hu Jintao. Nothing illegal about that.

It’s not clear Roche still even owns Obama.com. But this year, suspiciously, the site began sending visitors to the Obama campaign’s donation page on the Web. Some 68% of Obama.com’s visitors are foreign.

Similarly, the Obama re-election campaign itself seems to be encouraging illegal foreign contributions.

Its social media website, my.barackobama.com, gets about 20% of its visitors from foreign locations. Anyone who uses the website, says the GAI, “immediately begins receiving solicitations for donations.”

However, “At no point … is a visitor asked whether he or she can legally donate to a U.S. election,” it notes.

The revelation is troubling, since China’s government has a history of trying to manipulate U.S. politicians, especially — but not exclusively — Democrats.

In 1996, Chinese agent Johnny Chung gave almost $100,000 to American politicians, much of it from powerful members of China’s military. Chung reportedly gave $300,000 to President Clinton’s campaign.

The Justice Department in 1997 launched two investigations of reported attempts of high-level Chinese officials to “buy influence” with U.S. politicians, especially the Democratic National Committee.

With the Internet, China seems to have found a road to political clout bigger than an eight-lane highway.

Under the current president, the U.S. has largely ceded control of the Western Pacific to China and let that nation’s massive military buildup go unchallenged. Meanwhile, until recently, Obama soft-pedaled even the mildest criticisms of China’s economic policies.

But then, why bite the hand that feeds you

Not directly connected to the illegal activity of the President of the United States but troubling—no, shocking—to Patriots and Constitutional Conservatives is this revelation. Robert Roche serves on the Board of Directors of Forbes Inc. beginning March 9, 2012. Forbes is a major business communications company centered in Forbes Magazine. The well known (and thought of) Conservative commentator, Steve Forbes is the Chairman. Roche would have been hand-picked by Steve Forbes.

Posted in Cover-up, Foreign influence on American elections, Obama, Scandal, State of Obama's America | Leave a comment

PHONY SCANDALS OR PHONY PRESIDENT? PART TWO—FAST AND FURIOUS

Posted on July 28, 2013 by Richard Johnson

If this is phony, Mr. President, Why do you cover it up? The correct word, Mr. President is not phony. The correct word is felony.

The Fast and Furious scandal broke more than two years ago. But we quickly learned we faced a cove-up. Attorney General Holder and his top deputies knew nothing. President Obama knew nothing. Congress faced stone walling, cover-up, lying under oath by Holder. As a direct result Holder is the first and only Attorney General to be found (June 28, 2012) in contempt of Congress.

Cover-up

In spite of the stonewalling and cover-up, we have learned plenty. Within weeks we found that, in a March 24, 2009 White House press conference, Deputy Attorney General David Ogden announced the program which they called gunrunner at that time. Take a look:

Most of the media has ignored the Fast and Furious cover-up. Fox News has been and remains almost alone in the media exposing this set of crimes that reach from the White House all the way into Mexico. CBS investigative correspondent Sharyl Attkisson, is one notable exception. Here is an in depth interview Attkisson gave CSPAN November 2011. You need to watch it. If not now, when?

This summer one could say, “The Empire Struck Back.” In May Attkisson reported she has been frozen out by Obama’s White House. A month later Attkisson discovered her computers have been hacked and compromised.

While the scandal traces to the White House decision in March 2009, the cover-up began after the murder of U.S. Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry December 15, 2010. It is easy to criticize and condemn politicians; Democrats for aiding and abetting the unindicted felons at the helm of our government, Republicans for ducking their heads and not doing enough. We can only express gratitude to the House Government Oversight Chairman Darrell Issa and several courageous members of his committee. As they seek the Fast and Furious truth, through their leadership, the House of Representatives has passed the Brian A Terry Memorial Act.

Terry’s parents statement, published June 20, 2012, speaks for itself with power and eloquence. Here is is in full:

“Attorney General Eric Holder’s refusal to fully disclose the documents associated with Operation Fast and Furious and President Obama’s assertion of executive privilege serves to compound this tragedy. It denies the Terry family and the American people the truth.  Our son, Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry, was killed by members of a Mexican drug cartel armed with weapons from this failed Justice Department gun trafficking investigation.  For more than 18 months we have been asking our federal government for justice and accountability.  The documents sought by the House Oversight Committee and associated with Operation Fast and Furious should be produced and turned over to the committee.  Our son lost his life protecting this nation, and it is very disappointing that we are now faced with an administration that seems more concerned with protecting themselves rather than revealing the truth behind Operation Fast and Furious.”

There are a pile of other murders carried out with Fast and Furious weapons walked by the Obama Administration to drug cartel kingpins. The Mexican government seems to have quit updating the number of Mexican murders with Fast and Furious weapons after their September 2011 count of 210. However a January Jan. 29, 2013 assassination of Police Chief Luis Lucio Rosales Astorga, of Hostotipaquillo in the west-central Mexican state of Jalisco was uncovered and revealed this month. The Astorga assassins used Fast and Furious guns.

To be continued

Posted in A Criminal Enterprise, Cover-up, Lawless Government, Scandal | Leave a comment

PHONY SCANDALS OR PHONY PRESIDENT? PART ONE—BENGHAZI

Posted on July 26, 2013 by Richard Johnson

President Obama called the growing list of scandals in his administration “Phony” Wednesday, July 24. He repeated the charge again the next day. We will measure the charge against each scandal. Today it is Benghazi

Results.911.2012

We know President Obama’s decisions to conduct the Benghazi gun running operation and, when the compound was attacked by terrorists, go to bed leaving the Americans to fend for themselves, and lead a cover-up seems a scandal to many including the families of the four Americans left behind dead.

Christopher Stevens was the first U.S. Ambassador killed on duty in more than 30 years. His grieving family has not been publicly critical of President Obama or Secretary Clinton. All Americans have grieved for the loss of Stevens. But we should remember his mission is the reason for the cover-up of Benghazi. While not covered by the fraud Big Media, we knew before the end of 2012 that Stevens was the Administration’s point man running guns to (al Qaeda connected) rebels in Libya and then Syria. Stevens’ autopsy was not released but we know he did not die of smoke inhalation.

Stevens series

Ambassador Stevens died of beating, torture and, by accounts, sodomy

Sean Smith

Sean Smith was the Information Manager for the U.S. Foreign service in Benghazi. While the President called Benghazi a phony scandal, he has said “When four Americans get killed, it’s not optimal,” and “There are going to be bumps in the road.”   Smith’s mother, Pat Smith said, “I don’t believe him anymore. He’s wrong. My son is dead. How could that be phony?”  She also said President Obama has never revealed what, if anything, he was doing while workers at the Benghazi embassy were urgently requesting support, nor has the administration explained why no forces were sent to protect the embassy.

Woods.Doherty

Ty Woods and Glen Doherty were former Navy Seals employed by the CIA. While Smith had been killed and Stevens was dragged out of the “mission” by Islamists to be tortured and killed later, Woods, Doherty and a Diplomatic Security Agent, David Ubben, were able to rescue some twenty other Americans before Woods and Doherty were killed and Ubben was critically wounded. Ubbens is still recovering in Walter Reed Hospital in suburban Washington. Just last Memorial Day Woods and Doherty were memorialized at the Navy’s Mt. Soledad Memorial Wall near San Diego, CA. “Glen and Ty were the kind of men this country is proud to produce as citizens and as warriors,” said keynote speaker Navy Seal Captain, Jason Ehret. “That fateful night in Benghazi, they did what I expect any SEAL would have done. … They ran to the sound of gunfire.” You’ll want to see the response from the Doherty and Woods families:

We agree, Mrs. Woods, your husband and the others, making a difference with their heroism that night, September 11, 2012, certainly answered the question, “What difference does it make?” and no, Mrs. Woods, they are not “bumps in the road.” And Mr. President, while you may be running a phony scam on America, Benghazi is not a phony scandal.

Posted in Benghazi, Lawless Government, Scandal | Leave a comment

AS THE PRESIDENT DIVIDES AMERICA SCANDALS KEEP GROWING

Posted on July 24, 2013 by Richard Johnson

President Obama is personally involved in the IRS scandal

Hofacre,Hull

We know, from the testimony of IRS analysts Ms. Hofacre and Mr. Hull, the TEA Party applications were ordered sent to the IRS Office of Chief Counsel where they were shelved without action. We also know the IRS Chief Counsel is William Wilkins appointed by President Obama—clearly a strictly political appointment. But you almost certainly do not know why Bill Wilkins was the right man. Here is the inside story from the Washington Post:

Wilkins left the Senate Finance Committee staff in 1988 to join the Washington, D.C., office of Wilmer, Cutler & Pickering (now known as WilmerHale). During a 21-year career at the firm, Wilkins helped nonprofit and corporate clients navigate the murky world of tax law.

In August 2008 Wilkins’ peers in the American Bar Association recognized his expertise by naming him chair of their Section of Taxation, the largest association of tax attorneys in the country. He held the prestigious position until being confirmed as IRS counsel by the Senate in July 2009.

Role in Obama IRS Case

In February 2008 the IRS launched an investigation into a speech made by then-Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) at Chicago’s United Church of Christ. The IRS said the probe would determine whether the event was a violation of the rule that bars church participation in political campaigns.

The investigation was a serious matter for the church, as punishment for such an IRS violation can range from a hefty fine to a devastating revocation of tax-exemption status.

Obama’s speech, which he delivered months before announcing his presidential candidacy, focused on his personal journey in the Christian faith. United Church of Christ officials steadfastly defended their actions and said they took pains to make sure the event wasn’t political.

After the IRS investigation was made public, the Washington, D.C., office of WilmerHale announced it would defend the United Church of Christ on a pro-bono basis. Wilkins and a colleague at the law firm were placed in charge of the high-profile case.

On May 13, 2008, the IRS closed the investigation into the speech with a formal letter declaring no laws were broken. The unusually quick resolution of the case was probably due, in part, to the skilled representation provided by Wilkins and others at WilmerHale.

There you have it. Wilkins is a man that can get quick resolution of an IRS matter. On the other hand, his office is as good as you could ask for in blocking potential political opposition such as the Tea Parties. But remember, President Obama declared before the world that he learned of the IRS scandal, along with the rest of us, from the news. His innocent hands were clean.

Remember now the Tea Party applications were in pigeon holes in the Bill Wilkins’ IRS Office of Chief Counsel by spring 2012. I learned yesterday President Obama met with IRS chief counsel Wilkins on April 23, 2012; Wilkins’ boss, then-IRS commissioner Douglas Shulman, visited the Eisenhower Executive Office Building on April 24, 2012, according to White House visitor logs; and April 25, 2012, Wilkins’ office sent the exempt organizations determinations unit “additional comments on the draft guidance” for approving or denying tea party tax-exempt applications, according to the IRS inspector general’s report.

Obama is off campaigning today in Illinois and Missouri.

Posted in A Criminal Enterprise, Lawless Government, Scandal | Leave a comment

HOUSE PROVISION TO CURTAIL NSA SNOOPING POWER: NSA RESPONDS—FAST

Posted on July 24, 2013 by Richard Johnson

A bipartisan amendment to the DoD appropriations bill is lead by Michigan Congressmen Justin Amash, R and John Conyers, D written to rein in NSA’s sweeping power to snoop on patriotic American citizens. A vote on the amendment is expected this week.

Alexander ID'd

But wait! The NSA acted with the speed, purpose, resolve and intimidation you hoped they would have applied to the Islamic Boston terrorists. There was an emergency top secret meeting called with House leadership and security members for Tuesday. We should know more clearly by the end of this week who is in control—the Peoples House or a secret rogue operation.

Posted in Lawless Government, State of Obama's America | Leave a comment

THE POLITICAL REALITY OF THE GEORGE ZIMMERMAN PROSECUTION

Posted on July 22, 2013 by Richard Johnson

Phase I Florida

As we know President Obama got involved in the investigation into the Trayvon Martin death in March and April of 2012. We know, like the other hustlers, the President did it for power. Specifically to gin up the black identity group of the Democrat Party in the 2012 Presidential election—and it worked.

I suspected Obama pressured Florida Governor Rick Scott to force Norm Wolfinger out as the Florida Eighteenth Judicial District State Attorney and, on March 22, 2012 appoint Angela Corey, State Attorney for the Florida Fourth Judicial Circuit, Special Prosecutor in the matter of the death of 17 year old Trayvon Martin.. I fortunately didn’t write it.

Bondi.2

Scott’s action insinuating politics and politicians directly into a proper criminal investigation was, not Presidential pressure, it was old fashioned cronyism. Governor Scott has a longtime political friend, Florida Attorney General, Pam Bondi. Both have enjoyed political support from another Bondi friend, Angela Corey. The last political activity for them from Corey was in 2010 when she generously gave them both support (including financial). In Bondi’s campaign, Corey was one of six district campaign chairmen. They are all Republicans.

Bondi, it turns out, has lots of friends including lead member of the Martin family legal team, Ben Crump. Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi, engineered the removal of investigators and a States Attorney creating the nearly 16 month persecution of George Zimmerman.

Posted in Getting Zimmerman | Leave a comment

PRESIDENT OBAMA TAKES A SECOND BITE OF THE ZIMMERMAN APPLE

Posted on July 21, 2013 by Richard Johnson

The Appointment of William Wilkins IRS Chief Counsel Was Completely Political

We remember in April, 2012, President Barack Obama involved himself in the tragic death some four weeks earlier of a Florida youth, Trayvon Martin. (“If I had a son, he’d look like Trayvon.”) The reason he did it then was simple; he needed a sharp emotional race division for the election. He needed to stir the passions of black Americans over race for the November election. He already had galvanized support from the “GLBT” crowd. (I know the acronym is considered obsolete and passé—I don’t care.) He also had a marvelously successful “War on Women” insuring a big turnout from that identity group. This did the trick for the black vote.

Now 15 months later, Obama waded in again with this statement following the not guilty verdict of murder defendant George Zimmerman a week ago.

“The death of Trayvon Martin was a tragedy. Not just for his family, or for any one community, but for America. I know this case has elicited strong passions. And in the wake of the verdict, I know those passions may be running even higher. But we are a nation of laws, and a jury has spoken. I now ask every American to respect the call for calm reflection from two parents who lost their young son. And as we do, we should ask ourselves if we’re doing all we can to widen the circle of compassion and understanding in our own communities. We should ask ourselves if we’re doing all we can to stem the tide of gun violence that claims too many lives across this country on a daily basis. We should ask ourselves, as individuals and as a society, how we can prevent future tragedies like this. As citizens, that’s a job for all of us. That’s the way to honor Trayvon Martin.”

But the President wasn’t done. Every race hustler in the country, including Attorney General Holder, has been beating the drum all week for 100 cities ‘Justice for Trayvon rallies’. Friday, Obama weighed in again from the White House press room. In part he said:

“Well, I — I wanted to come out here first of all to tell you that Jay is prepared for all your questions and is — is very much looking forward to the session.

“Second thing is I want to let you know that over the next couple of weeks there are going to obviously be a whole range of issues — immigration, economics, et cetera — we’ll try to arrange a fuller press conference to address your questions.

“The reason I actually wanted to come out today is not to take questions but to speak to an issue that obviously has gotten a lot of attention over the course of the last week, the issue of the Trayvon Martin ruling. I gave an — a preliminary statement right after the ruling on Sunday, but watching the debate over the course of the last week, I thought it might be useful for me to expand on my thoughts a little bit.

“First of all, you know, I — I want to make sure that, once again, I send my thoughts and prayers, as well as Michelle’s, to the family of Trayvon Martin, and to remark on the incredible grace and dignity with which they’ve dealt with the entire situation. I can only imagine what they’re going through, and it’s — it’s remarkable how they’ve handled it.

“The second thing I want to say is to reiterate what I said on Sunday, which is there are going to be a lot of arguments about the legal — legal issues in the case. I’ll let all the legal analysts and talking heads address those issues.

“The judge conducted the trial in a professional manner. The prosecution and the defense made their arguments. The juries were properly instructed that in a — in a case such as this, reasonable doubt was relevant, and they rendered a verdict. And once the jury’s spoken, that’s how our system works.

“But I did want to just talk a little bit about context and how people have responded to it and how people are feeling. You know, when Trayvon Martin was first shot, I said that this could have been my son. Another way of saying that is Trayvon Martin could have been me 35 years ago. And when you think about why, in the African-American community at least, there’s a lot of pain around what happened here, I think it’s important to recognize that the African-American community is looking at this issue through a set of experiences and a history that — that doesn’t go away.

“There are very few African-American men in this country who haven’t had the experience of being followed when they were shopping in a department store. That includes me.

“And there are very few African-American men who haven’t had the experience of walking across the street and hearing the locks click on the doors of cars. That happens to me, at least before I was a senator. There are very few African-Americans who haven’t had the experience of getting on an elevator and a woman clutching her purse nervously and holding her breath until she had a chance to get off. That happens often.

“And you know, I don’t want to exaggerate this, but those sets of experiences inform how the African-American community interprets what happened one night in Florida. And it’s inescapable for people to bring those experiences to bear.

“The African-American community is also knowledgeable that there is a history of racial disparities in the application of our criminal laws, everything from the death penalty to enforcement of our drug laws. And that ends up having an impact in terms of how people interpret the case.

“Now, this isn’t to say that the African-American community is naive about the fact that African-American young men are disproportionately involved in the criminal justice system, that they are disproportionately both victims and perpetrators of violence. It’s not to make excuses for that fact, although black folks do interpret the reasons for that in a historical context.

“We understand that some of the violence that takes place in poor black neighborhoods around the country is born out of a very violent past in this country, and that the poverty and dysfunction that we see in those communities can be traced to a very difficult history.

“And so the fact that sometimes that’s unacknowledged adds to the frustration. And the fact that a lot of African-American boys are painted with a broad brush and the excuse is given, well, there are these statistics out there that show that African-American boys are more violent — using that as an excuse to then see sons treated differently causes pain.

“I think the African-American community is also not naive in understanding that statistically somebody like Trayvon Martin was probably statistically more likely to be shot by a peer than he was by somebody else.

“So — so folks understand the challenges that exist for African-American boys, but they get frustrated, I think, if they feel that there’s no context for it or — and that context is being denied. And — and that all contributes, I think, to a sense that if a white male teen was involved in the same kind of scenario, that, from top to bottom, both the outcome and the aftermath might have been different.” (Full text)

So what’s going on now, the 2014 elections? Not at all. The Zimmerman verdict is so valuable to Obama—and make no mistake the not guilty verdict is perfect for him—because of one word, scandal. Going back only a year we have

  • Benghazi
  • Several hundred million illegal foreign campaign contributions
  • The presidential order to all federal employees to spy on and report on others
  • The Justice department spying on the American media
  • The IRS scandal
  • The NSA/FBI/unknown others spying on Americans.

That’s six major scandals in one year (10 Months). This leaves out several minor scandals and ignores earlier ones such as Fast and Furious. Is America focused on our law breaking President and his out of control Executive branch? No. With total cooperation from his friends in the media, the President has the Nation’s focus is on “Justice for Trayvon.”

We ought have contempt for the President’s lawless destruction of our great Republic but tip your hat to him—his timing is perfect. Just Thursday, the House oversight committee followed the IRS wrongdoing trail right into the IRS Chief Counsel’s office. The IRS Chief Counsel is appointed by the President. In the case of this President, as you would expect, the appointment was completely political; one William Wilkins. The evidence has reached the Chief Counsel’s office. It has not yet reached Mr. Wilkins or the White house but it will. The only reason this man with his experiences and record was appointed was to thwart citizen opposition to the fundamental transformation of our free America. Chairman Darryl Issa and his tough committee will find the trail.

Because of the political skill of Obama and the fraud actions of his cronies in the media, few Americans yet know the facts in these scandals. We must see that they do. We must see that, in these scandals, we get “Justice for America.”

Posted in A Criminal Enterprise, Cover-up, IRS Abuse, Lawless Government, Scandal | 1 Comment

ABORTION: A CORE EVIL OF OUR TIME AND OUR LAND

Posted on July 8, 2013 by Richard Johnson

The Raw Story headline said, “Texas special session to pass strict anti-abortion bill.”

“After the Texas state Senate failed to pass an anti-abortion bill that would ban abortion after 20 weeks and enact strict measures on abortion clinics that are likely to close all but five clinics in the state, the Texas legislature reconvened to conduct another “emergency” session to pass the bill.

The bill failed to come to a vote before the midnight deadline on June 26, due to a more than 10-hour filibuster by Texas [S]tate Sen. Wendy Davis (D), several other Democratic state senators delaying on poins of order and a rancorous crowd. Almost immediately after the bill’s defeat, Republican Gov. Rick Perry ordered the legislature to gather for a special session to pass the bill.”

Legally allowing abortion through 20 weeks is labeled “strict.” Expecting the same clinical standards for removing a dead or about to be dead baby from a pregnant woman as for a tonsillectomy are called “strict measures” in America. But a baby killed at twenty (or 10 or 5) weeks is just as dead as one killed at 24 or 36 weeks. Every baby killed in the false name of “Women’s rights” is evil—EVIL. Every other approach is only a rationalization no different than a child trying to bend the rules, i.e.

“Hey Ma, is this shirt too dirty to wear?” young Johnny called down the stairs. “If there is any question,” answered his mother, “It’s too dirty to wear.” Abortion is just as simple. If a pregnancy was “terminated,” a baby was killed.

There is no question the people of Texas would stand against any and every abortion if they had their rightful sovereign choice. We should not be surprised at the “rancor” we have witnessed in the Texas matter. You may be familiar with the incident in the Texas Capitol building where a few hundred prolife Texans were singing Amazing Grace. They were surrounded by a similar number of pro-abortion activists chanting, “Hail Satan, hail Satan.” Liberty Counsel Action’s Matt Barber has written a must read analysis in WND showing an impact this is already having. For the Progressive left, abortion is clearly their sacrament and they do know their god.

We can agree that one abortion is an act of evil. But those individual acts do not by themselves bring a civilization down. The proclamation of the emanation of a penumbra in the Constitution that abortion is the law of the land is what has brought darkness upon our Nation. Let’s quantify the abortion evil of this present darkness a bit.

Let’s start with the World. There will be about 135,000 abortions worldwide today. That will accumulate to about 49 million babies killed this and every year. Since 1980 the accumulation has reached more than 1 billion 300 million babies slaughtered. Pause. Let that sink in: more than 113,500 babies will be killed today for nothing more than, “Hail Satan.”

Here in the United States 3,300 babies will die today for the “right” of abortion. We are killing 1,200,000 babies per year in America and have piled up 56 million 397 thousand little babies since the 1973 Roe v Wade decision. We can hardly comprehend.

This is so important. These numbers are not understandable unless we clearly understand the wonder and value of one little human being. Please watch or re-watch this Conception to birth with Dr. Alexander Tsiaras:

You see we are killing thousands—millions—billions of these little marvels from God. It is O.K. Weep with me.

We are all guilty. But those personally invested in this evil have a burden you and I do not bear and cannot understand. Let us look at two examples.

Planned Parenthood is the leading business monetizing the evil of abortion; they perform about 345,000 abortions/year. American taxpayers (you and me) send Planned Parenthood more than $700 million each year. That works out to more than $2,000 for each “procedure” as supplemental revenue for PPA. Planned Parenthood is at the center of an untold insidious aspect of American abortion. But first let us find a face for the evil that is abortion.

The face of this evil in America is self-appointed by word and deed. An Illinois State Senator would not qualify for the face an evil of this proportion. I have no idea how a United States Senator could be qualified either. But a President of the United States who, by word and deed, is “down for the struggle”—that would qualify. President Obama is no “late to the party” or “abortions that are safe, legal and rare” like President Clinton. No, no! He got busy laying down a record for the future face for abortion as a young State Senator. Here is the partial record from BornAliveTruth.org:

Timeline

2001

February 22: Born Alive Infants Protection Act (Senate Bill 1095) was first introduced in the Illinois Senate.

March 28: Then State Senator Barack Obama voted “NO” on the bill in the Senate Judiciary Committee. (Re: dating, the bill was introduced one day, and the vote was held the next. The tally is dated the day the hearing on the bill began.)

March 30: Obama spoke against the bill on the Senate floor.

March 30: Obama voted “PRESENT” on the Senate floor.

2002

January 30: Born Alive Infants Protection Act (Senate Bill 1662) was reintroduced after failing to become law the prior year.

March 6: Then State Senator Barack Obama voted “NO” on the bill in the Senate Judiciary Committee.

April 4: Obama spoke against the bill on the Senate floor.

April 4: Obama voted “NO” on the Senate floor.

July 18: Congress passed the federal version of the Born Alive Infants Protection Act.

August 5: The federal version of the Born Alive Infants Protection was signed by the President into law.

(That would be President G. W. Bush.)

2003

February 19: Born Alive Infants Protection Act (Senate Bill 1082) was reintroduced after failing to become law the prior year.

March 13: After first voting for an amendment to make the Illinois Born Alive Infants Protection Act identical to the federal version, Obama voted against the bill. (Re: dating, the bill was introduced one day, and the vote was held the next. The tally is dated the day the hearing on the bill began.)

The next year Mr. Obama went on to the United States Senate where he said, “If one of my daughters makes a mistake, I don’t want them punished with a baby.” (Something like a STD to him.)

President Obama became the first U.S. President to speak at the Annual Planned Parenthood Conference, April 26, 2013, “reaffirming the core principle that has guided the organization for nearly a century…”

“As long as we’ve got to fight to protect a woman’s right to make her own choices about her own health, I want you to know You’ve also got a President who’s right there with ya’ fighting every step of the way…. Thank you Planned Parenthood. God bless you.”

Notice killing babies is renamed, “Women’s right to health choices.” “Woe unto them that call evil good…” The Prophet Isaiah proclaimed.

Now we turn to the insidious aspect of Planned Parenthood unknown to almost everyone but clear to the hard core progressives including President Obama. The black race is a target of the abortion brigade at large and particularly of Planned Parenthood—78% of PPA abortion facilities are in minority neighborhoods. Let’s consider two 40%s. First: about 40% of all black conceptions end in a baby killing abortion. Second: About 40% of all abortions in the United States are performed on black women. The original Planned Parenthood objective is being carried out before this Nation’s collective eyes. This month Travon Martin and his mother are offered up as National race victims, consider this image of another black whose mother mourns alone Mr. President:

Consider this babies mother

Finally, consider these images, Mr. President:

No 1 Killer.blacks

Endangered species

And you, committed worker for good, may want to visit and know this Web Site:

Black Genocide.org

Posted in A Criminal Enterprise, Life, Living in the Light, Obama Age of Darkness, Obama's America: Racism, Reclaiming and Restoring America, This Present Darkness | Leave a comment